| • |
Judgment that the applied-for mark “월간맥주 (monthly beer)” is dissimilar with the prior-registered trademark “ 월간피자(monthly pizza)”. [Patent Court of Korea |
|
|
| • |
Determination of Specific Acts of Infringement and Patent Infringement of Medicinal Use Inventions (Case No.: 2023 Na 11009, Supreme Court Ruling dated September 5, 2024) |
|
|
| • |
Relationship Between the Recognition of Exception to Loss of Novelty and Freely Operated Design (2021hu10473) |
|
|
| • |
Only the Actual Inventors May be Disclosed |
|
|
| • |
Patent Court of Korea’s Decision 2023 Heo 13971, rendered on May 9, 2024: Judgment on whether proviso to Article 119(3) of Trademark Act (Justifiable grounds for non-use of |
|
|
| • |
Determination of Which Inventions Qualify for Patent Term Extension (Supreme Court Decision 2021 Hu 11070, on July 25, 2024) |
|
|
| • |
Patent Court Case: “Impact of Inadequate compliance with Court’s Order to Submit Materials on Calculation of Damages” (Patent Court Decision No. 2022Na1449, rendered |
|
|
| • |
Examination Guidelines from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on Inventorship in AI-Assisted Inventions |
|
|
| • |
Patent Court of Korea Rules that the Applied-for Mark “ZEZU” Is a Conspicuous Geographical Name (2023 heo 11500) |
|
|
| • |
Determination of Whether the Subject Invention Is Specified in a Trial to Confirm Scope of Rights (Supreme Court Case No. 2021Hu10725, Decided December 28, 2023) |
|
|
