| • |
The judgment that the applied-for mark ‘natura B&C’ is not similar to the pre-registered trademark ‘Natura’ (Patent Court 2022Heo 2745) |
|
|
| • |
Supreme Court case providing guidelines on determining whether the inventiveness of a numerical limitation invention is denied based on the cited prior art reference. (Decision in |
|
|
| • |
Case regarding reconfirmation of criteria for determining abuse of market dominance under the Fair Trade Act (Supreme Court Decision No. 2020Du31897, rendered on April 13, 2023) |
|
|
| • |
A Case Regarding the Inventiveness of Crystalline Form Inventions (Supreme Court Decision No. 2019Hu11800, rendered on March 13, 2023) |
|
|
| • |
Partial refusal and Request of reexamination for trademark registration applications implemented by the Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) (Applied from February 4, 2023) |
|
|
| • |
A Case Regarding the Description Requirement of the Specification for the Medicinal Use Invention Specifying Dosing Regimen and Dosage (Patent Court Decision No. 2021Heo37 |
|
|
| • |
Can Artificial Intelligence (AI) be recognized as an inventor? |
|
|
| • |
Criteria for determining the difficulty of configuration of a compound that is theoretically within the scope of the chemical formulas and its substituents described in Markush fo |
|
|
| • |
The Patent Court’s ruling that the applied-for mark “DEW” lacks distinctiveness due to a number of prior-registered marks combined with a word “Dew” (2021 Heo 5099) |
|
|
| • |
Method of Judging Novelty of Patent Applications in the Case of Having the Same Constitution or Property with the Prior Art (The Korean Supreme Court’s decision on Decemb |
|
|
